Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Plaintiff: Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Case Number: 2:2020cv12916
Filed: October 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Terrence G Berg
Referring Judge: Anthony P Patti
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michael L. Ossy appearing on behalf of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Ossy, Michael)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER GRANTING #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. ( Response due by 1/4/2021) Issued by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11) (Bernard, G.)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Bernard, G.)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: G. Christopher Bernard appearing on behalf of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Bernard, G.)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan* (NAhm)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC (Curtner, Gregory)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8136696 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Curtner, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC
Represented By: Gregory L. Curtner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Represented By: G. Christopher Bernard
Represented By: Michael L. Ossy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?