Taylor v. Chapman et al
Case Number: 2:2020cv13041
Filed: November 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: No cause code entered

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's April 19, 2023 62 Report and Recommendation Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (TMcg)
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motions to Appoint Counsel (ECF Nos. 49 , 50 ) and Directing Defendants to Answer Remaining Claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (MacKay, K)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OPINION and ORDER Accepting and Adopting 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Granting 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and Denying 36 MOTION to Amend the Complaint - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Denying 30 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (MacKay, K)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION and ORDER Partially Dismissing 1 Complaint - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Chapman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?