Robinson v. City of Farmington Hills et al
Dwayne J. Robinson |
Jeff King and City of Farmington Hills Doing business as Farmington Hills Police Department |
2:2021cv10150 |
January 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Sean F Cox |
Curtis Ivy |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling Conference set for 4/13/2021 at 02:30PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (Zaidel, B) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by All Defendants (Fleury, Thomas) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Fleury, Thomas) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Jeff King* (SKra) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *City of Farmington Hills* (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND filed by Dwayne J. Robinson against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8292644 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Charge of Discrimination, #3 Exhibit B - Right to Sue Letter) (Sklar, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.