Kirtley v. Sybra, LLC.
Adele Kirtley |
Sybra, LLC. |
2:2021cv11516 |
June 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Kimberly G Altman |
David M Lawson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 WITNESS LIST by Adele Kirtley (Klisz, Timothy) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Timothy J Klisz appearing on behalf of Adele Kirtley (Klisz, Timothy) |
NOTICE of Error directed to Kelley M. Haladyna re #8 Notice. Document is prohibited discovery, disclosure or a certificate of service thereof. Document was stricken. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (DPer) |
Filing 8 [STRICKEN - DISCOVERY] NOTICE by Sybra, LLC. of Service of Discovery Requests (Haladyna, Kelley) Modified on 8/23/2021 (DPer). |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Interim Status Conference set for 10/7/2021 at 3:30 PM; Discovery due by 1/27/2022; Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 2/18/2022; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/13/2022 at 3:00 PM; Bench Trial set for 10/24/2022 at 8:30 AM before District Judge David M. Lawson. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (Refer to image for additional dates) (SPin) |
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge David M. Lawson: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 8/4/2021. (SPin) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew M. Palmer on behalf of Sybra, LLC.. (Palmer, Andrew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew M. Palmer on behalf of Sybra, LLC.. (Palmer, Andrew) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 8/4/2021 at 3:00 PM before District Judge David M. Lawson. (See image for document deadline.) (SPin) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Sybra, LLC.. (Haladyna, Kelley) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Sybra, LLC. (Haladyna, Kelley) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Sybra, LLC. from Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, case number 21-004958-NO. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8517650 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Communications re Amount in Controversy) (Haladyna, Kelley) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kirtley v. Sybra, LLC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sybra, LLC. | |
Represented By: | Kelley M. Haladyna |
Represented By: | Andrew M. Palmer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Adele Kirtley | |
Represented By: | Timothy J Klisz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.