Mitan v. Jims Pravada, LLC et al
Keith J. Mitan |
Jims Pravada, LLC and Vladislav Safir |
2:2021cv11731 |
July 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Gershwin A Drain |
Curtis Ivy |
Real Property: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with jury demand filed by Keith J. Mitan against defendants. (DPer) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Jims Pravada, LLC, Vladislav Safir (Gorosh, Bruce)[BY JIMS PRAVADA, LLC ONLY] Modified on 8/3/2021 (DPer). |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Jims Pravada, LLC, Vladislav Safir. (Gorosh, Bruce) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (KBro) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants Jims Pravda, LLC and Vladislav Safir from Oakland County Circuit Court, case number 21-186105-CZ. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8552026 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Merlanti, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.