Radney-Maxwell et al v. Menard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Latasha Radney-Maxwell and Makenzi Maxwell
Defendant: Menard, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv11851
Filed: August 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly G Altman
Referring Judge: Mark A Goldsmith
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (HIPAA). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: ADR Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/2/2022 11:00 AM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, Discovery due by 5/2/2022, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 5/16/2022, Final Settlement Conference set for 9/19/2022 01:30 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/24/2022 01:30 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, Jury Trial set for 11/7/2022 08:30 AM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Refer to image for additional dates) (KSan)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for telephonic proceedings before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 9/23/2021 (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (KSan)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Set Deadlines/Hearings: TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference RESET for 9/23/2021 04:00 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith (TIME CHANGE ONLY). Attorney for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call and then include the Court when all parties are available by calling 313/234-5240. (KSan)
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Plaintiff's Preliminary Witness and Exhibit List WITNESS LIST by All Plaintiffs (Fantich, Brian)
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATED ORDER for Adjournment of Telephonic Scheduling Conference ( TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference RESET for 9/23/2021 11:00 AM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith Attorney for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call and then include the Court when all parties are available by calling 313/234-5240.). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Shreve, Mark)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Menard, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Menard, Inc. for Menard, Inc.. (Shreve, Mark)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE to Defendant's Affirmative Defenses, Reliance on Jury Demand by All Plaintiffs. (Fantich, Brian)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Regarding Telephonic Scheduling Conference ( TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 9/1/2021 11:30 AM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith). Attorney for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call and then include the Court when all parties are available by calling 313/234-5240. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Non-Party Fault by Menard, Inc. (Shreve, Mark)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Menard, Inc.. (Shreve, Mark)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Regarding Certification Requirements. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Regarding Removal. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Menard, Inc. from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 21-008892-NO. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8572086 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - CSC Service of Process) (Shreve, Mark)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Radney-Maxwell et al v. Menard, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latasha Radney-Maxwell
Represented By: Brian L. Fantich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Makenzi Maxwell
Represented By: Brian L. Fantich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Menard, Inc.
Represented By: Mark E. Shreve
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?