Lewis v. Greason et al
Case Number: 2:2021cv11939
Filed: October 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: No cause code entered

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER DENYING 177 MOTION to Amend Complaint, STRIKING 178 , 181 Second and Third Amended Complaints, and DENYING 180 MOTION to Submit Evidence. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (AChu)
March 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 179 OPINION AND ORDER denying 155 Motion for relief from judgment and 173 Motion to alter judgment. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (DPer)
January 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 172 JUDGMENT - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 171 ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's 164 Objections 15 Accepting and Adopting Report and Recommendation granting 134 Motion to Dismiss; and denying 150 Motion to Amend the Complaint - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER denying 154 Motion for Leave to File Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend March 20, 2033 Judgment - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER Adopting 114 Report and Recommendation, Striking 124 Second Amended Complaint and 125 Affidavit in Support, and Resolving Outstanding Motions 33 , 74 , 108 , 116 , 117 , 121 , 123 , 126 , and 128 - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER Overruling 100 Objection to 96 Order - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) Modified on 1/11/2023 (LBar).
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER LIFTING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUIRING RESPONSES TO PENDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS re 74 MOTION to Dismiss OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION for Summary Judgment WITH BRIEF IN SUPPORT ON THE BASIS OF EXHAUSTION WITH A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by FNU Campbell, Richard Russell, Melody Wallace AND 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment on the basis of exhaustion with a brief in support and certificates of service filed by Jeffery Luzius: (Plaintiff's Responses due by 12/27/2022) - Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman. (CCie)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER Striking 92 Request - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER Overruling 86 Objections; Denying 88 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections; and Accepting and Adopting 81 Report and Recommendation Denying 55 Motion for TRO; and Denying as Moot 52 , 72 Motions to Stay - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 54 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 73 MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 63 MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN CLAIMS - Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman. (CCie)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 26 Motion TO CONDUCT SERVICE THROUGH ECF AND LIMIT SERVICE WHERE IT REQUIRES SERVICE ON MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS - Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman. (CCie)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION and ORDER Partially Dismissing 1 Complaint and Denying 3 MOTION for Joinder - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Greason et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?