U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. City of Grosse Pointe Park
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company |
City of Grosse Pointe Park |
2:2021cv12544 |
October 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David M Lawson |
Anthony P Patti |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 11 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re #8 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by City of Grosse Pointe Park. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A(1), #2 Exhibit A(2)) (Howlett, Thomas) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by U.S. Specialty Insurance Company. (Brandt, Arthur) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas J. Howlett on behalf of City of Grosse Pointe Park. (Howlett, Thomas) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. City of Grosse Pointe Park waiver sent on 11/12/2021, answer due 1/11/2022. (Shell, Erica) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Erica J. Shell on behalf of City of Grosse Pointe Park. (Shell, Erica) |
Filing 4 ORDER for U.S. Specialty Insurance Company to Show Cause Why the Court Should Not Dismiss the Case. Show Cause Response due by 11/16/2021. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *City of Grosse Pointe Park* (KBro) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by U.S. Specialty Insurance Company Civil Cover Sheet (Brandt, Arthur) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by U.S. Specialty Insurance Company against City of Grosse Pointe Park. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8671715 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E) (Brandt, Arthur) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (KBro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. City of Grosse Pointe Park | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: U.S. Specialty Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Arthur F. Brandt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Grosse Pointe Park | |
Represented By: | Erica J. Shell |
Represented By: | Thomas J. Howlett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.