Moore et al v. Meijer, Inc.
|Plaintiff:||Bobbie Moore, Samantha Hatfield and Gary Grant|
|Filed:||February 25, 2022|
|Court:||US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan|
|Presiding Judge:||Curtis Ivy|
|Referring Judge:||George Caram Steeh|
|Nature of Suit:||Other Fraud|
|Cause of Action:||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud|
|Jury Demanded By:||Plaintiff|
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
|Date Filed||Document Text|
|March 1, 2022||Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Gary Grant, Samantha Hatfield, Bobbie Moore (Suciu, Nick)|
|February 28, 2022||Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Meijer, Inc.* (LGra)|
|February 28, 2022||A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)|
|February 25, 2022||Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Bobbie Moore, Gary Grant, Samantha Hatfield against Meijer, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8809368 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Kent County - County Where Action Arose: Kent County - County of 1st Defendant: Kent County. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Suciu, Nick)|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.