Church of the Word v. Bloomer
Plaintiff: Church of the Word, d/b/a Word Network Church and Church of the Word Doing business as Word Network Church
Defendant: George Bloomer
Case Number: 2:2022cv12687
Filed: November 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Nancy G Edmunds
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Church of the Word Proof of Service-Summons Complaint on G. Bloomer (Below, John)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Courtney L. Nichols on behalf of George Bloomer. (Nichols, Courtney)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca C. Seguin-Skrabucha on behalf of Church of the Word, d/b/a Word Network Church. (Seguin-Skrabucha, Rebecca)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda McSween Empey on behalf of Church of the Word, d/b/a Word Network Church. (Empey, Amanda)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Linda V. Parker to District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (SSch)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *George Bloomer* (NAhm)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Church of the Word, d/b/a Word Network Church against George Bloomer with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9120806 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland County - County Where Action Arose: Oakland County - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Below, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Church of the Word v. Bloomer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Church of the Word, d/b/a Word Network Church
Represented By: John T. Below
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Church of the Word Doing business as Word Network Church
Represented By: Amanda McSween Empey
Represented By: Rebecca C. Seguin-Skrabucha
Represented By: John T. Below
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Bloomer
Represented By: Courtney L. Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?