Dixon v. Macomb Correctional Facility Mental Health
| Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr. and Stoic |
| Macomb Correctional Facility Mental Health |
| 2:2023cv12666 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya) |
Filing 6
ORDER Summarily Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Order Dismissing Case, #7 Judgment on Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr Pris. No. 679336 at Macomb Correctional Facility, 34625 26 Mile Rd., New Haven, MI 48048. (HRya) |
| Filing 5 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (MCho) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit trust account statement. Correction due by 11/27/2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (NAhm)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Mediation Program (TTho) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr. (TTho) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr against Macomb Correctional Facility Mental Health (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet) (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
