Eklund v. Ross et al
| Richard Eklund |
| Richard Ross, Auto Konnect LLC and Roger Caramanoff |
| 2:2024cv11543 |
| June 12, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Brandy R McMillion |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Auto Konnect, LLC Operating Agreement dated January 30, 2008, #3 Exhibit B - Employment Agreement dated January 30, 2008, #4 Exhibit C - Stock Redemption Agreement dated January 30, 2015, #5 Exhibit D - Action by Written Consent of a Majority of the Members of Auto Konnect, LLC dated June 6, 2023, and cover letter to Plaintiff re same, #6 Exhibit E - Action by Written Consent of a Majority of the Members of Auto Konnect, LLC dated July 14, 2023, and cover letter to Plaintiff re same) (Plunkett, David) |
Filing 8
STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Responsive pleading due by 8/2/2024. Signed by District Judge Brandy R. McMillion. (LHos)
|
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Richard E. Rassel, III appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Rassel, Richard) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David E. Plunkett appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Plunkett, David) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Auto Konnect LLC served on 6/24/2024, answer due 7/15/2024; Roger Caramanoff served on 6/24/2024, answer due 7/15/2024; Richard Eklund served on 6/24/2024, answer due 7/15/2024. (Piszczatowski, Walter) Modified on 6/26/2024 (JPar). [Richard Ross served on 6/24/2024] |
| Filing 4 [WRONG EVENT USED - DOCUMENT ENTITLED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL] AMENDED #1 Complaint,, by Richard Eklund (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A-First Action by Written Consent, #3 Exhibit B-Letter accompanying First Action by Written Consent, #4 Exhibit C-Section Action by Written Consent, #5 Exhibit D-Letter accompanying Second Action by Written Consent, #6 Exhibit E-Original Operating Agreement, #7 Exhibit F-Employment Agreement, #8 Exhibit G-Stock Redemption Agreement) (Piszczatowski, Walter) Modified on 6/20/2024 (LHos). |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Steve J. Weiss appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Weiss, Steve) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Auto Konnect LLC, Roger Caramanoff, Richard Ross* (JPar) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (JPar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by Richard Eklund against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9827313 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Clark County, Nevada - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Collier County, Florida. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G) (Piszczatowski, Walter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
