Wylie Pierson El [ENJOINED FILER] v. Taylor et al
Emmanuel Quentin Wylie Pierson El [ENJOINED FILER] |
Michigan, State of and Marlena Elayne Taylor |
2:2025cv10124 |
January 13, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Denise Page Hood |
Curtis Ivy |
Other Statutory Actions |
No cause code entered |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau) |
![]() |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Judgment, #4 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Emmanuel Quentin Wylie Pierson El [ENJOINED FILER] at 18493 Sorrento St, Detroit, MI 48235. (LSau) |
Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge David M. Lawson to District Judge Denise Page Hood pursuant to Local Rule 83.11. (SSch) (SSch). |
Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Matthew F. Leitman to District Judge David M. Lawson pursuant to Local Rule 83.11. (SSch) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Emmanuel Quentin Wylie Pierson El [ENJOINED FILER]. [Pro Se Upload] (SSch) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Emmanuel Quentin Wylie Pierson El [ENJOINED FILER] against Michigan, State of, Marlena Elayne Taylor (Attachments: #1 Enjoining Order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)[Pro Se Upload] (SSch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.