Simpson et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
| Ted A Simpson and Kimberly Simpson |
| Freedom Mortgage Corporation |
| 2:2025cv10344 |
| February 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Mark A Goldsmith |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SSch) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Freedom Mortgage Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Freedom Mortgage Holdings LLC for Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Mihelick, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Freedom Mortgage Corporation from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 24-018232-CH. Receipt No: AMIEDC-10107282 - Fee: $405 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Lower Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit C- Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Mihelick, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
