Michigan Vision Institute, PLLC et al v. Republic Services, Inc. et al
| Michigan Vision Institute, PLLC and Andrew B. Wade, D.D.S., M.S., LLC d/b/a Wade Orthodontics |
| Republic Services, Inc., Tri-County Refuse Service, Inc. d/b/a AW of Flint, Republic Services of Flint, Synergy Environmental, Allied Waste Systems, Inc. and Browning Ferries Industries of Ohio, Inc. d/b/a Republic Services of Central Ohio |
| 2:2025cv11454 |
| May 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| F Kay Behm |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Andrew B. Wade, D.D.S., M.S., LLC d/b/a Wade Orthodontics (Jackson, Angela) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Michigan Vision Institute, PLLC (Jackson, Angela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-10241468 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Genesee - County Where Action Arose: Genesee - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Jackson, Angela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
