Bilek v. Creekside Point LLC et al
Plaintiff: James Bilek
Defendant: Royal Management Company LLC, Creekside Point LLC and Evangelista Development, L.L.C.
Case Number: 3:2018cv13865
Filed: December 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Robert H Cleland
Referring Judge: Stephanie Dawkins Davis
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 623
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Royal Management Company LLC waiver sent on 2/4/2019, answer due 4/5/2019. (Fagan, Barry) Modified on 2/4/2019 (DWor). [DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE"]
February 4, 2019 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Evangelista Development, L.L.C. waiver sent on 2/4/2019, answer due 4/5/2019. (Fagan, Barry) Modified on 2/4/2019 (DWor). [DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE"]
February 4, 2019 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Creekside Point LLC waiver sent on 2/4/2019, answer due 4/5/2019. (Fagan, Barry) Modified on 2/4/2019 (DWor). [DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE"]
December 13, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Royal Management Company LLC* (DWor)
December 13, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Evangelista Development, L.L.C.* (DWor)
December 13, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Creekside Point LLC* (DWor)
December 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND filed by James Bilek against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7027970 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Fagan, Barry)
December 13, 2018 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DWor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bilek v. Creekside Point LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Royal Management Company LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Creekside Point LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evangelista Development, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Bilek
Represented By: Barry S. Fagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?