Tacker v. General Motors LLC et al
| James Russell Tacker |
| John Does and General Motors LLC |
| 3:2020cv11557 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Robert H Cleland |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM Acknowledging Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1(a) by General Motors LLC (Hall, Amber) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by James Russell Tacker against All Defendants. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Virden Mallett, Jessica) |
Filing 14
OPINION AND ORDER Terminating as Moot #7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; Granting #11 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint and Directing Counsel to File A Joint Memorandum by 8/5/2020. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
|
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Motion Hearing on 8/5/20 is Cancelled re #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) Order to enter (LWag) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel H. Lary on behalf of General Motors LLC. (Lary, Rachel) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber Nicole Hall on behalf of General Motors LLC. (Hall, Amber) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by James Russell Tacker. (Virden Mallett, Jessica) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by James Russell Tacker. (Virden Mallett, Jessica) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jessica Virden Mallett appearing on behalf of James Russell Tacker (Virden Mallett, Jessica) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING on #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial). Motion Hearing set for 8/5/2020 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland (LWag) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) by General Motors LLC. (Bush, Cheryl) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by General Motors LLC. (Bush, Cheryl) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Cheryl A. Bush on behalf of General Motors LLC. (Bush, Cheryl) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Daniel V. Barnett appearing on behalf of James Russell Tacker (Barnett, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Docket Sheet from Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:20-cv-00422. |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: This case has been transferred from the Eastern District of Arkansas. Pending motions must be refiled on this court's docket by the filing party. Attorneys not admitted to practice in this court must complete the attorney admissions application and be admitted before appearing on this court's docket. All previously filed documents can be accessed on the originating court's docket using PACER. (VLun) |
|
Filing 2
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting in part and denying in part #4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The request for dismissal is denied, but the request to transfer is granted. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to immediately TRANSFER this case to the Eastern District of Michigan. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 06/10/20. (dmm) [Transferred from ared on 6/12/2020.]
|
| Filing 1 TRANSFERREDNOTICE OF REMOVAL by General Motors LLC from Prairie County Circuit Court, case number 59NCV-20-00010. Fee of $400 paid; receipt number LIT076897. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) [Transferred from Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:20-cv-00422.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
