Prudential Defense Solutions Inc. v. Graham et al
Prudential Defense Solutions Inc. |
Robert Charnot, Mark Sheahan, James Howard and Jake W Graham |
3:2020cv11785 |
July 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Robert H Cleland |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RESPONSE to #13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Prudential Defense Solutions Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Communication from Plaintiff's Counsel to Defendant's Counsel, #3 Exhibit 2 - Unpublished Caselaw) (Shipper, Benjamin) |
Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Prudential Defense Solutions Inc. against Robert Charnot, Jake W Graham, Mark Sheahan. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Shipper, Benjamin) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF HEARING on #13 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 9/16/2020 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland (LWag) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Robert Charnot, Jake W Graham, Mark Sheahan. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - LARA Report, #3 Exhibit 2 - Minutes, #4 Exhibit 3 - Employee/Contractor Noncompete Agreement) (Boettcher, Matthew) |
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Robert H. Cleland: Telephonic Status Conference held on 7/31/2020, The parties indicated willingness to continue good faith discussions in an attempt to achieve a mutually satisfactory resolution. The court expects Defendant to file an answer or a motion to dismiss ( Response due by 8/7/2020) If no filing is made by 8/7/2020 the court will reconvene the parties for a telephonic status conference to discuss the case. (LWag) |
Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Robert H. Cleland: Telephonic Status Conference held on 7/21/2020, ( TELEPHONIC Status Conference set for 7/31/2020 10:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) The Parties indicated willingness to discuss positions in good faith, attempting to explore mutually satisfactory resolution. To facilitate discussion, the court will delay imposing any deadlines. At the continued conference, the court expects to hear the results of the parties' discussion and their positions on the case going forward. If a preliminary injunction hearing is necessary, parties should be ready to provide their views about the scope and timing of any preparatory discovery. Please note that no in -person hearing can be held pending resolution of the pandemic. Zoom or similar technology may be used. (LWag) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Prudential Defense Solutions Inc. as to James Howard (WITHOUT PREJUDICE) (Shipper, Benjamin) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J. Boettcher on behalf of Robert Charnot, Jake W Graham, Mark Sheahan. (Boettcher, Matthew) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Mark Sheahan served on 7/7/2020, answer due 7/28/2020. (Schwartz, Stuart) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. James Howard served on 7/3/2020, answer due 7/24/2020. (Schwartz, Stuart) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Jake W Graham served on 7/2/2020, answer due 7/28/2020. (Schwartz, Stuart) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Jake W Graham served on 7/7/2020, answer due 7/28/2020. (Schwartz, Stuart) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Robert Charnot served on 7/7/2020, answer due 7/28/2020. (Schwartz, Stuart) |
Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING #2 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Prudential Defense Solutions Inc., Holding in Abeyance Request for Preliminary Injunction; DIRECTING Plaintiff to Effectuate Proper Service by 7/14/2020 and setting a ( TELEPHONIC Status Conference for 7/21/2020 10:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Robert Charnot, Jake W Graham, James Howard, Mark Sheahan* (SKra) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Prudential Defense Solutions Inc. (Schwartz, Stuart) |
Filing 2 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Prudential Defense Solutions Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Restrictive Agreement between Prudential Defense and Defendant Graham, #3 Exhibit 2 - Restrictive Agreement between Prudential Defense and Defendant Howard, #4 Exhibit 3 - [Proposed] Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order, #5 Exhibit 4 - Unpublished Caselaw) (Shipper, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Prudential Defense Solutions Inc. against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7898984 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Kent County, DE - County Where Action Arose: Monroe, MI - County of 1st Defendant: Cook County, IL. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Graham Employee/Contractor Noncompete Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Howard Employee/Contractor Noncompete Agreement) (Schwartz, Stuart) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.