A et al v. United States of America et al
Jeremy Armstrong, Kiersten Reeser and L A |
W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, Alma Garlo, MD, Monica Hill, MD, Center for Family Health, Joanne Kingsley, MD, Charles Edward Rollison, DO, United States of America and Ronald Nichols, MD |
3:2021cv11317 |
June 3, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Robert H Cleland |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. § 2271 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Monica Hill, MD served on 6/25/2021, answer due 7/16/2021. (Patterson, Matthew) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Joanne Kingsley, MD served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. (Patterson, Matthew) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Center for Family Health served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. (Patterson, Matthew) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Ronald Nichols, MD waiver sent on 6/8/2021, answer due 8/9/2021. (Patterson, Matthew) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Alma Garlo, MD waiver sent on 6/28/2021, answer due 8/27/2021; Charles Edward Rollison, DO waiver sent on 6/28/2021, answer due 8/27/2021. (Patterson, Matthew) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney on behalf of United States of America served on 6/14/2021, answer due 8/13/2021. (Patterson, Matthew) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Merrick B. Garland served on 06/14/2021. (Patterson, Matthew) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand (Reliance on) by Alma Garlo, MD, Charles Edward Rollison, DO. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Certificate of Service) (Valitutti, Ralph) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH waiver sent on 6/8/2021, answer due 8/9/2021. (Timoney, Ryan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew M Patterson on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Patterson, Matthew) |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Geoffrey N. Fieger on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Fieger, Geoffrey) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Re Issued for * All Defendants * [ATTORNEYS CONTACT INFORMATION CORRECTED] (NAhm) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (NAhm) |
REQUEST for SUMMONS for All Defendants. (Beam, Jack) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
Filing 2 Ex Parte MOTION re #1 Complaint,, to Appoint Next Friend by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order) (Beam, Jack) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: BMIEDC-8488128 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Jackson - County Where Action Arose: Jackson - County of 1st Defendant: Unknown. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Coversheet, #2 Exhibit AOM of Murray, #3 Exhibit AOM of Fingerer, #4 Exhibit AOM of Khoury) (Beam, Jack) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.