GMA Cover Corp. v. Saab Barracuda, LLC

Plaintiff: GMA Cover Corp.
Defendant: Saab Barracuda LLC
Case Number: 4:2010cv12060
Filed: May 21, 2010
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Office: Detroit Office
County: St. Clair
Presiding Judge: Bernard A Friedman
Referring Judge: Paul J Komives
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15:2
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 28, 2012 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Adopting 28 Report and Recommendation and Granting Defendant's 20 Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing the Case. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
February 16, 2011 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER re 14 Stipulation filed by GMA Cover Corp. Signed by District Judge Mark A Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GMA Cover Corp. v. Saab Barracuda, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GMA Cover Corp.
Represented By: William L. Fealko, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saab Barracuda LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?