Richardson v. Smith
Petitioner: Donald Richardson
Respondent: Willie Smith
Case Number: 1:2011cv13632
Filed: August 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Bay City Office
County: Montcalm
Presiding Judge: Paul J. Komives
Presiding Judge: Thomas L. Ludington
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 25 Denying Petiton for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
November 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying 8 Application for Appointment of Counsel and 7 Petition for Release on Recognizance filed by Donald Richardson. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Willie Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donald Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?