Scott v. MacLauren
Petitioner: Shaun Scott
Respondent: Duncan MacLaren
Case Number: 4:2012cv10416
Filed: January 31, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Flint Office
County: Chippewa
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Goldsmith
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER Denying Petitioner's 12 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
September 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Granting Respondent's 7 Motion for Summary Judgment, Issuing a Certificate of Appealability and Granting Petitioner Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. MacLauren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Shaun Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Duncan MacLaren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?