Stevens v. Berghuis
Petitioner: David Stevens
Respondent: Mary Berghuis
Case Number: 4:2013cv13268
Filed: July 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Muskegon
Presiding Judge: Charles E. Binder
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Goldsmith
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER Denying the Petition for Write of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 1 ), Declining to Issue a Certificate of Appealability, and Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Denying Respondent's 6 Motion to Dismiss the Habeas Petition, (Response due by 8/22/2014). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevens v. Berghuis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mary Berghuis
Represented By: Laura Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?