Davenport v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Ronald W Davenport
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 4:2014cv14144
Filed: October 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Flint Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Patricia T. Morris
Presiding Judge: Linda V. Parker
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 4208
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 OPINION and ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
September 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION and ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 13 Report and Recommendation; and Granting Defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davenport v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald W Davenport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?