Ruckel v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Paul Ruckel |
| Mark Fields, Alan Mulally, Robert L. Shanks, James Patrick Hackett and Ford Motor Company |
| James Emerson and William T. Higgs Trust, Power Holding Corporation, and the November Family Trust DD |
| 4:2017cv13536 |
| October 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Linda V Parker |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
STIPULATED ORDER of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER Striking #18 Stipulation and Proposed Order. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
|
| Filing 18 [STRICKEN] NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James Emerson, Paul Ruckel, William T. Higgs Trust, Power Holding Corporation, and the November Family Trust DD 5/5/1983 as to James Emerson Without Prejudice (Handelman, Leigh) Modified on 5/8/2018 (RLou). |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Leigh Handelman on behalf of James Emerson, Paul Ruckel, William T. Higgs Trust, Power Holding Corporation, and the November Family Trust DD 5/5/1983. (Handelman, Leigh) |
|
Filing 16
STIPULATED ORDER for Scheduling of Amended Complaint and Response(s). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #11 Motion of the Ford Investor Group to: (1) Appoint Lead Plaintiffs; and (2) Approve Lead Plaintiffs' Selection of Counsel. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (JOwe)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE by James Emerson, William T. Higgs Trust, Power Holding Corporation, and the November Family Trust DD 5/5/1983 re #11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel NOTICE OF MOTION OF THE FORD INVESTOR GROUP TO: (1) APPOINT LEAD PLAINTIFFS; AND (2) APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS SELECTION OF COUNSEL NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF THE FORD INVESTOR GROUP TO: (1) APPOINT LEAD PLAINTIFFS; AND (2) APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS SELECTION OF COUNSEL (Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION by Jeremy A. Lieberman re #11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel NOTICE OF MOTION OF THE FORD INVESTOR GROUP TO: (1) APPOINT LEAD PLAINTIFFS; AND (2) APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS SELECTION OF COUNSEL filed by James Emerson, William T. Higgs Trust, Power Holding Corporation, and the November Family Trust DD 5/5/1983 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Press Release, #2 Exhibit 2 - Certifications, #3 Exhibit 3 - Loss Chart, #4 Exhibit 4 - Rosen Resume, #5 Exhibit 5 - Pomerantz Resume, #6 Exhibit 6 - Joint Declaration) (Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re #11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel NOTICE OF MOTION OF THE FORD INVESTOR GROUP TO: (1) APPOINT LEAD PLAINTIFFS; AND (2) APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS SELECTION OF COUNSEL filed by James Emerson, William T. Higgs Trust, Power Holding Corporation, and the November Family Trust DD 5/5/1983. (Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel NOTICE OF MOTION OF THE FORD INVESTOR GROUP TO: (1) APPOINT LEAD PLAINTIFFS; AND (2) APPROVE LEAD PLAINTIFFS SELECTION OF COUNSEL by James Emerson, William T. Higgs Trust, Power Holding Corporation, and the November Family Trust DD 5/5/1983. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Proposed Order) (Lieberman, Jeremy) |
|
Filing 10
STIPULATED ORDER for Responding to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jerome S. Fortinsky on behalf of Mark Fields, Ford Motor Company, James Patrick Hackett, Alan Mulally, Robert L. Shanks. (Fortinsky, Jerome) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Mark Fields, Ford Motor Company, James Patrick Hackett, Alan Mulally, Robert L. Shanks (Meyers, Roger) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Roger P. Meyers on behalf of Mark Fields, Ford Motor Company, James Patrick Hackett, Alan Mulally, Robert L. Shanks. (Meyers, Roger) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick G. Seyferth on behalf of Mark Fields, Ford Motor Company, James Patrick Hackett, Alan Mulally, Robert L. Shanks. (Seyferth, Patrick) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Mark Fields, Ford Motor Company, James Patrick Hackett, Alan Mulally, Robert L. Shanks* (Krause, S) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (Krause, S) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Paul Ruckel (Hood, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph A. Hood, II on behalf of Paul Ruckel. (Hood, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 ADDENDUM re #1 Complaint,, Civil Cover Sheet by Paul Ruckel (Lieberman, Jeremy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Paul Ruckel against Mark Fields, Ford Motor Company, James Patrick Hackett, Alan Mulally, Robert L. Shanks with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-6458692 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Maricopa County, Arizona - County Where Action Arose: Wayne County, Michigan - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne County, Michigan. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Schedule A) (Lieberman, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
