Johnson v. Doe et al
Arthur Johnson |
Jane Doe and John Doe |
4:2018cv13631 |
November 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Matthew F Leitman |
Mona K Majzoub |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER Denying as Moot #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #10 Order on Motion for Permanent Injunction, Order on Motion for TRO on Arthur Johnson Pris. No. 191831 at 10100 Harper Avenue, Detroit, MI 48213. (HMon) |
Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Arthur Johnson re #7 Regarding Parties Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (NAhm) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Arthur Johnson. (ATee) |
Filing 7 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Arthur Johnson. (DPer) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT in support of #1 Complaint by Arthur Johnson (DPer) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Mediation Program (NAhm) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminaty Injunction by Arthur Johnson. (SSch) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Arthur Johnson. (SSch) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arthur Johnson against Jane Doe, John Doe (SSch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.