Garnett v. Heat Treating Services Corporation of America
| Debra Garnett |
| Heat Treating Services Corporation of America |
| 4:2019cv10168 |
| January 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATED ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice and Without Costs. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings before Magistrate Judge David R. Grand: Settlement Conference held on 4/12/2019 Disposition: Case settled, stipulated order of dismissal to be submitted within 30 days. (EBut) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Settlement Conference set for 4/12/2019 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge David R. Grand (EBut) |
|
Filing 7
STIPULATED ORDER STAYING CASE Pending Mediation. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING OTHER MATTERS to Magistrate Judge Grand: Settlement Conference. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nina M. Abboud on behalf of Heat Treating Services Corporation of America. (Abboud, Nina) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Heat Treating Services Corporation of America waiver sent on 1/17/2019, answer due 3/18/2019. (Cole, Randal) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Randal R. Cole on behalf of Heat Treating Services Corporation of America. (Cole, Randal) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Heat Treating Services Corporation of America* (SOso) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Debra Garnett against Heat Treating Services Corporation of America with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7070627 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Kotzian, David) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SOso) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garnett v. Heat Treating Services Corporation of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debra Garnett | |
| Represented By: | David A. Kotzian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Heat Treating Services Corporation of America | |
| Represented By: | Randal R. Cole |
| Represented By: | Nina M. Abboud |
| Represented By: | Nina M. Jankowski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
