Priorities USA et al v. Nessel
| Rise, Inc., Priorities USA and Detroit/Downriver Chapter of the A. Philip Randolph Institute |
| Dana Nessel |
| 4:2020cv10211 |
| January 27, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| Mark A Goldsmith |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Detroit/Downriver Chapter of the A. Philip Randolph Institute, Priorities USA, Rise, Inc.. (Elias, Marc) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Rise, Inc. (Elias, Marc) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Detroit/Downriver Chapter of the A. Philip Randolph Institute (Elias, Marc) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Priorities USA (Elias, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Priorities USA, Detroit/Downriver Chapter of the A. Philip Randolph Institute, Rise, Inc. against Dana Nessel. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 0645-7576993 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Ingham - County of 1st Defendant: Ingham. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Elias, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
