Lucio v. Jensen Center Limited Partnership
Lucio and Lola Lucio |
Jensen Center Limited Partnership |
4:2020cv10683 |
March 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
Anthony P Patti |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to Answer. Responsive pleading due by 6/8/2020. Signed by District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (THal) |
Filing 6 ORDER RE: #5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER. Answer due: 5/8/2020. Signed by District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (THal) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer by All Defendants (Van Suilichem, Donald) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Donald A. Van Suilichem appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Van Suilichem, Donald) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Donald A. Van Suilichem appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Van Suilichem, Donald) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Jensen Center Limited Partnership* (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lola Lucio against Jensen Center Limited Partnership. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7679223 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Genesee - County Where Action Arose: Genesee - County of 1st Defendant: Genesee. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Monismith, Pete) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.