Bingham v. Coffelt et al
| Billy Bingham |
| A. Coffelt and T. Schubring |
| 4:2020cv12686 |
| September 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order Staying Case on Billy Bingham #202937, G. ROBERT COTTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 3500 N. ELM ROAD, JACKSON, MI 49201 (THal)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER STAYING CASE and Referral to the Pro Se Prisoner Early Mediation Program. Signed by District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis. (THal)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Directing Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee in the amount of $7.00 and subsequent payments. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (TTho)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #3 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Billy Bingham, 202937, G. ROBERT COTTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 3500 N. ELM ROAD, JACKSON, MI 49201 (TTho)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Billy Bingham. (DAll)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Billy Bingham against A. Coffelt, T. Schubring (DAll) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2020: #1 Coversheet) (DAll).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
