Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Plaintiff: Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Retirement Trust & Plan, Pipefitters Local 636 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Retiree and Widow Benefit Fund, Metro Detroit Plumbing Industry Training Trust and Joint Administrative Committee of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry in the Detroit Area
Defendant: Johnson Controls, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2023cv12354
Filed: September 15, 2023
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Judith E Levy
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Johnson Controls, Inc.* (SSch)
September 19, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SSch)
September 15, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Pipefitters Local 636 Retiree and Widow Benefit Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund, Metro Detroit Plumbing Industry Training Trust, Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Fund, Joint Administrative Committee of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry in the Detroit Area, Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Retirement Trust & Plan, Pipefitters Local 636 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund against Johnson Controls, Inc.. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9491726 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Milwaukee County, WI. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Selwocki, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Benefit Pension Fund
Represented By: David J. Selwocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Fund
Represented By: David J. Selwocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund
Represented By: David J. Selwocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipefitters Local 636 Defined Contribution Retirement Trust & Plan
Represented By: David J. Selwocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipefitters Local 636 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund
Represented By: David J. Selwocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pipefitters Local 636 Retiree and Widow Benefit Fund
Represented By: David J. Selwocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Metro Detroit Plumbing Industry Training Trust
Represented By: David J. Selwocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joint Administrative Committee of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry in the Detroit Area
Represented By: David J. Selwocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson Controls, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?