Murphy v. The Auto Club Group et al
Plaintiff: Regis Murphy
Defendant: The Auto Club Group and Unify HR
Case Number: 5:2024cv11168
Filed: May 1, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Paul D Borman
Referring Judge: Curtis Ivy
2 Judge: Judith E Levy
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John Stephen Gilliam on behalf of The Auto Club Group. (Gilliam, John)
May 30, 2024 Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David E. Plunkett appearing on behalf of Unify HR (Plunkett, David)
May 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time for Defendants to Answer #1 Complaint; Responsive Pleading due by 7/12/2024, Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
May 7, 2024 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Unify HR served on 5/6/2024, answer due 5/28/2024. (Fink, David)
May 7, 2024 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. The Auto Club Group served on 5/6/2024, answer due 5/28/2024. (Fink, David)
May 3, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Lechtzin on behalf of Regis Murphy. (Lechtzin, Eric)
May 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of RECUSAL and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Paul D. Borman in Detroit to District Judge Judith E. Levy in Ann Arbor. (SSch)
May 2, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Unify HR* (DPer)
May 2, 2024 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *The Auto Club Group* (DPer)
May 2, 2024 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)
May 1, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Regis Murphy against The Auto Club Group, Unify HR with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9775314 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - COBRA Notice, #2 Exhibit B - Model COBRA Continuation Coverage Election Notice) (Fink, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. The Auto Club Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regis Murphy
Represented By: David H. Fink
Represented By: Eric Lechtzin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Auto Club Group
Represented By: John Stephen Gilliam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unify HR
Represented By: David E. Plunkett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?