Crump #236528 v. Prelesnik et al
| Horace W. Crump #236528 |
| John Prelesnik, Gary Ball, Rodney Allen, Jane Hodges, C. Heffelbower, Unknown Parties, Unknown Leslie and Unknown Beechum |
| 1:2010cv00353 |
| April 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Ionia |
| Robert J. Jonker |
| Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 122 , 130 , 106 ; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, mil)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 119 , granting 76 ; Respondent Sherry is terminated from the case ; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 84 ; 63 is denied; 61 granted in part and denied in part; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 53 , motion for summary judgment 40 is denied; Plaintiff's notice of appeal 37 of the Magistrate Judge's order is denied; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
