RAM Construction Services of Michigan, Inc. v. Caasti Professional Contracting Service, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: RAM Construction Services of Michigan, Inc.
Defendant: Caasti Professional Contracting Service, Inc. and Granite Re, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00635
Filed: June 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Office: Southern Division (1) Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Janet T. Neff
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40:270
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RAM Construction Services of Michigan, Inc. v. Caasti Professional Contracting Service, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caasti Professional Contracting Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Granite Re, Inc.
Represented By: Mark M. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RAM Construction Services of Michigan, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel G. Kielczewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?