Pann #254048 v. Corizon Health Services et al
| Robert Pann #254048 |
| Corizon Health Services, Prison Health Services, Unknown Party #1, K. Silvernail, Unknown Stieve, Unknown McKenna, Unknown Borgerding, Unknown Worrel, C. Burdette, M. Wilkenson, P. Lamb, Unknown Party #2 and Unknown Part(y)(ies) |
| 1:2014cv01074 |
| October 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Muskegon |
| Ellen S. Carmody |
| Janet T. Neff |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, except as noted 133 ; Defendants motions for Summary Judgment 92 , 95 are GRANTED; Plaintiff's motion 140 to include Defendant's application for Plaintiff to receive a Medicaid Card is GRANTED to the extent that the record in this case will include Dkt [140-1]; Plaintiff's claims against the unidentified John Doe defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely effect service and this action is terminated; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER REJECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 55 ; Objections 57 are granted in part and denied in part; Motions for Summary Judgment 32 and 39 are DENIED without prejudice; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
