Wise v. Kerkstra Precast, Inc.
Plaintiff: William J. Wise
Defendant: Kerkstra Precast, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00985
Filed: August 31, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Ellen S Carmody
Referring Judge: Janet T Neff
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2018 Copy of Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, #8 sent via U.S. Mail to William J. Wise (ns)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 11/2/2018 at 10:00 AM at 650 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Janet T. Neff; status report due by 10/30/2018; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
October 9, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Kerkstra Precast, Inc. re Answer to Complaint #6 (Edsenga, Patrick)
October 9, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by Kerkstra Precast, Inc. (Edsenga, Patrick)
October 9, 2018 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Patrick Michael Edsenga on behalf of defendant Kerkstra Precast, Inc. (Edsenga, Patrick)
October 9, 2018 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of William H. Fallon on behalf of defendant Kerkstra Precast, Inc. (Fallon, William)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
October 3, 2018 Copy of Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge #5 sent via U.S. Mail to William J. Wise (ns)
October 2, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS returned executed by US Marshal by mail with acknowledgment of receipt of summons and complaint by Sandi Lobhezoo for Kerkstra Precast, Inc. served on 9/18/2018, answer due 10/9/2018 (ns)
September 4, 2018 (DISREGARD) SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kerkstra Precast, Inc. and delivered to US Marshal for service (ns) Modified text on 9/4/2018; entered in error (ns).
September 4, 2018 Copy of Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 sent via U.S. Mail to William J. Wise (ns)
September 4, 2018 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kerkstra Precast, Inc. and delivered to US Marshal for service (ns)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, jal)
August 31, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (ns)
August 31, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kerkstra Precast, Inc. filed by William Wise (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-J #2 Proposed Summons) (ns).
August 31, 2018 COMPLAINT RECEIVED; IFP Decision Pending (ns)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wise v. Kerkstra Precast, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kerkstra Precast, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick Michael Edsenga
Represented By: William H. Fallon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William J. Wise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?