Rodriguez v. Woods Carpentry, Inc. et al
| Jorge Rodriguez |
| WOODS CARPENTRY, INC., Daniel Woods and Woods Carpentry, Inc |
| 1:2018cv01353 |
| December 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ellen S Carmody |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re MOTION to dismiss or in the alternative, consolidate cases #15 filed by Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc (Dzuris, Brittany) Modified text on 1/17/2019 (pjw). |
| Filing 16 BRIEF in support of MOTION to dismiss or in the alternative, consolidate cases #15 filed by Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (Dzuris, Brittany) Modified text on 1/17/2019 (pjw). |
| Filing 15 MOTION to dismiss or in the alternative, consolidate cases by defendants Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc; (Dzuris, Brittany) Modified text on 1/17/2019 (pjw). Modified on 1/17/2019 (pjw). |
Filing 14
ORDER OF REFERENCE: case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, per the consent of the parties #13 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE re #12 Consent to Magistrate Judge by defendants Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc (Dzuris, Brittany) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: the parties shall, not later than 1/16/2019, file a joint notice addressing consent; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendants Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc #8 filed by Jorge Rodriguez (Alvarez, Robert) Modified text on 1/9/2019 (pjw). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 motion for extension of time; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 by defendants Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc; (Dzuris, Brittany) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendants Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc (Dzuris, Brittany) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Woods Carpentry, Inc (Dzuris, Brittany) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Donald R. Visser on behalf of defendants Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc (Visser, Donald) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Agustin Henriquez, Jr on behalf of plaintiff Jorge Rodriguez (Henriquez, Agustin) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Brittany Burke Dzuris on behalf of defendants Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc (Dzuris, Brittany) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed; Woods Carpentry, Inc served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019 (Alvarez, Robert) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Daniel Woods, Woods Carpentry, Inc (pjw) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (pjw) |
| Filing 3 Memorandum regarding potentially related case returned to Clerk from Magistrate Judge Carmody indicating that this case is related to 1:18-cv-879 (jlb) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Jorge Rodriguez in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4308932 (Alvarez, Robert) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Alvarez, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Jorge Rodriguez (Alvarez, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
