Gadola v. United States of America
Petitioner: Sameer Paul Gadola
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2019cv00737
Filed: September 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Janet T Neff
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2019 Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Sameer Paul Gadola #21552-040 (pjw)
September 10, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of receipt of case (pjw)
September 9, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) filed by Sameer Paul Gadola (Attachments: #1 Request to Proceed IFP) (pjw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gadola v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Alexis Marie Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sameer Paul Gadola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?