Kowall et al v. Benson
| Paul Opsommer, Scott Dianda, David E. Nathan, Mary Valentine, Roger Kahn, Joseph Haveman, Clark Harder, Douglas Spade, Mark Meadows and Mike Kowall |
| Jocelyn Benson |
| 1:2019cv00985 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Janet T Neff |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
PRE-MOTION CONFERENCE ORDER setting forth the briefing schedule re anticipated motions; Answer to plaintiffs' first amended complaint due not later than March 26, 2020; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
| Filing 16 MINUTES of pre-motion conference re #11 held before Judge Janet T. Neff (Court Reporter: Paul Brandell) (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER scheduling a pre-motion conference regarding document number #11 : pre-motion conference is set for 2/25/2020 at 10:00 AM at 401 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Janet T. Neff; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE TO REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant Jocelyn Benson #11 ; filed by Scott Dianda, Clark Harder, Joseph Haveman, Roger Kahn, Mike Kowall, Mark Meadows, David E. Nathan, Paul Opsommer, Douglas Spade, Mary Valentine (Pellegrino, Ariana) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 motion for extension of time; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for extension of time to File Responsive Pleading by defendant Jocelyn Benson; (Meingast, Heather) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant Jocelyn Benson (Meingast, Heather) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting to an extent stipulated proposed order extending time #9 ; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by defendant Jocelyn Benson (Meingast, Heather) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Erik Alexander Grill on behalf of defendant Jocelyn Benson (Grill, Erik) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Heather S. Meingast on behalf of defendant Jocelyn Benson (Meingast, Heather) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed; Jocelyn Benson served on 12/12/2019, answer due 1/2/2020 (Pellegrino, Ariana) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Jocelyn Benson (ns) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #5 (Pellegrino, Ariana) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND A PERMANENT INJUNCTION against Jocelyn Benson filed by Clark Harder, Joseph Haveman, Mary Valentine, Paul Opsommer, Douglas Spade, Roger Kahn, David E. Nathan, Scott Dianda, Mike Kowall, Mark Meadows (Pellegrino, Ariana) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Jocelyn Benson (ns) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (ns) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Bursch, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief and a Permanent Injunction against Jocelyn Benson filed by Douglas Spade, Clark Harder, David E. Nathan, Roger Kahn, Joseph Haveman, Mary Valentine, Paul Opsommer, Scott Dianda (Bursch, John) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Scott Dianda, Clark Harder, Joseph Haveman, Roger Kahn, David E. Nathan, Paul Opsommer, Douglas Spade, Mary Valentine in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-4632743 (Bursch, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
