Schwab v. Wyoming Police Department et al
| Brian Keith Schwab |
| Amy Minton, Derick Bradford, Melissa Nestle, Wyoming, City of, Wyoming Police Department, Janelle Freeman, Unknown Party #1, Margaret McKinnon, Augustine Baar, Dave Hosfelt, Travis Rosema, Gabriel Cedillo, Kent County Parole Office, Mitchell Arrends and Todd Bailey |
| 1:2020cv00336 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
DECLARATION re #4 , #3 by plaintiff Brian Keith Schwab (ems)
|
|
Filing 4
BRIEF in support of MOTION to appoint counsel #3 filed by Brian Keith Schwab (ems)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to appoint counsel by plaintiff Brian Keith Schwab ; (ems)
|
|
Filing 2
FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by plaintiff Brian Keith Schwab (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents, #2 Cover Letter) (ems)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with magistrate referral and jury demand against Mitchell Arrends, Augustine Baar, Todd Bailey, Derick Bradford, Gabriel Cedillo, Janelle Freeman, Dave Hosfelt, Kent County Parole Office, Margaret McKinnon, Amy Minton, Melissa Nestle, Travis Rosema, Unknown Party #1, Wyoming Police Department, Wyoming, City of filed by Brian Keith Schwab (ems)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
