Fagan v. Trans Union, LLC et al
| Chad Fagan |
| I.C. System, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC |
| 1:2020cv00657 |
| July 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Janet T Neff |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by Trans Union, LLC (Brown, William) Modified text on 8/27/2020 (pjw). |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Trans Union, LLC identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC (Brown, William) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of William R. Brown on behalf of defendant Trans Union, LLC (Brown, William) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant I.C. System, Inc. (ndj) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Trans Union, LLC (ndj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (ndj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against I.C. System, Inc., Trans Union, LLC filed by Chad Fagan (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Trans Union, LLC, #3 Summons I.C. System, Inc.) (Kittell, Christopher) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Chad Fagan in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-5475786 (Kittell, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
