Murphy v. M Micro Technologies, Inc.
| Jason Murphy |
| M Micro Technologies, Inc. |
| Facilitative Mediator |
| 1:2020cv00951 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Janet T Neff |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting proposed stipulated order #28 ; this matter is dismissed with prejudice, and without costs or fees; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 28 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice and Without Costs to Any Party by plaintiff Jason Murphy (Edsenga, Patrick) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER granting STIPULATION #26 ; extending dismissal papers deadline to 5/4/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 26 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Deadline to File Dismissal Paperwork (3rd) by defendant M Micro Technologies, Inc. (Warner, Brent) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER granting STIPULATION #24 ; extending dismissal papers deadline to 4/20/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 24 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Deadline to File Dismissal Paperwork by plaintiff Jason Murphy (Edsenga, Patrick) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting STIPULATION #22 ; extending dismissal papers deadline to 4/6/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 22 PROPOSED JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Deadline to File Dismissal Paperwork by plaintiff Jason Murphy (Edsenga, Patrick) Modified text on 3/22/2021 (eod) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER requiring dismissal papers to be filed no later than 3/22/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 20 REPORT of facilitative mediation held 2/15/2021; mediation is Complete; case is Settled, closing documents to be filed by 30 days (Silver, Lee) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting STIPULATION #18 ; the deadline to complete mediation is extended until 2/15/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 18 CORRECTED PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Mediation Deadline by plaintiff Jason Murphy (Edsenga, Patrick) Modified text on 12/10/2020; this entry replaces #17 (ems). |
| Filing 17 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Mediation Deadline by plaintiff Jason Murphy (Edsenga, Patrick) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED NOTICE of appointment of Facilitative Mediator Lee T. Silver ; plaintiff VFM fee to be submitted by 12/1/2020 defendant VFM fee to be submitted by 12/1/2020 (lep) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of appointment of Facilitative Mediator Lee T. Silver ; plaintiff VFM fee to be submitted by 12/1/2020 defendant VFM fee to be submitted by 12/1/2020 (lep) |
| SELECTION of Lee Silver as facilitative mediator per email from counsel (lep) |
|
Filing 14
PRE-MOTION CONFERENCE ORDER; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTES of pre-motion conference via video conference re #8 held before Judge Janet T. Neff (Court Reporter: Paul Brandell) (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
| Filing 12 (RESTRICTED ACCESS) DOCUMENT by the Court (instructions for 11/12/20 pre-motion conference video hearing) [Access to this document is available to the Court and attorney(s) for M Micro Technologies, Inc., Jason Murphy only] (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER scheduling a pre-motion conference regarding document number #8 : pre-motion conference via video conference is set for 11/12/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Janet T. Neff; counsel shall not appear in person; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE TO REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant M Micro Technologies, Inc. #8 ; filed by Jason Murphy (Edsenga, Patrick) Modified text on 10/14/2020 (ems). |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of James Richard Peterson on behalf of plaintiff Jason Murphy (Peterson, James) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting to an extent #5 motion for extension of time; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 8 REQUEST for pre-motion conference by defendant M Micro Technologies, Inc. (Warner, Brent) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER regarding Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by defendant M Micro Technologies, Inc. (Warner, Brent) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 #5 filed by M Micro Technologies, Inc. (Warner, Brent) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 by defendant M Micro Technologies, Inc.; (Warner, Brent) |
| Filing 4 STATE COURT FILE received from Kent County Circuit Court (Register of Actions only) (ems) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by M Micro Technologies, Inc. (Warner, Brent) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee re corporate disclosure statement (ems) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kent County Circuit Court case number 20-03811-CBB filed by M Micro Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Summons and Complaint (State Court), #2 Exhibit B: Rhode Island Dept. of State Business Services Division Record for Micro, #3 Exhibit C: Florida Division of Corporations Record for Micro) (Warner, Brent) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant M Micro Technologies, Inc. in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-5750742 (Warner, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
