Jacobs v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Amber Elizabeth Jacobs
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv01005
Filed: October 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Sally J Berens
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2020 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Michael L. Shiparski on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Shiparski, Michael)
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 unopposed motion to stay; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (cbh)
December 12, 2020 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re MOTION to stay re #1 #6 filed by Commissioner of Social Security (Preston, Sarah)
December 12, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to stay re #1 by defendant Commissioner of Social Security; (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis, Office of Appellate Operations, Social Security Administration) (Preston, Sarah)
December 11, 2020 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Sarah E. Preston on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Preston, Sarah)
November 5, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed by US Marshal on Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, Commissioner of Social Security complete on 10/26/2020, answer due 12/28/2020 (ns)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (cbh)
October 22, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (ns)
October 22, 2020 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and delivered to US Marshal for service (ns)
October 21, 2020 Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Spencer, Karen)
October 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Amber Elizabeth Jacobs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Document to be Issued by the Court Fee Agreement, #3 Proposed Document to be Issued by the Court Summons) (Spencer, Karen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacobs v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Michael L. Shiparski
Represented By: Sarah E. Preston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Elizabeth Jacobs
Represented By: Karen M. Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?