Herndon #136007 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007 |
Nicole Doolittle, Joanne Bridgford, Brooke Oversmith, Mental Health Services, C. Traylor, David Maranka, Adam Yuhas, Chad Guilford, Carrie Bucholtz, Michigan Department of Corrections, John Davids and Heidi Washington |
1:2020cv01091 |
November 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Sally J Berens |
Hala Y Jarbou |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Without Payment of Initial Fee - Prisoner, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Clarence Watson Herndon #136007 (ems) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis without payment of an initial partial filing fee; plaintiff to remain liable for the filing fee as funds become available; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jal) |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by plaintiff Clarence Watson Herndon #136007 (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (ems) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral and jury demand against Joanne Bridgford, Carrie Bucholtz, John Davids, Nicole Doolittle, Chad Guilford, David Maranka, Mental Health Services, Michigan Department of Corrections, Brooke Oversmith, C. Traylor, Heidi Washington, Adam Yuhas filed by Clarence Watson Herndon #136007 (ems) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.