Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Heather L. Johnson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2020cv01223 |
| December 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/8/2021, answer due 3/9/2021 (pjw)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and delivered to US Marshal for service (pjw)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Heather L. Johnson (Rinck, James); this entry replaces #1 Modified text on 12/23/2020 (pjw)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (pjw)
|
|
Filing 3
FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by plaintiff heather L johnson, APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Rinck, James)
|
|
Filing 2
PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Rinck, James)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against commissioner filed by heather L johnson (Rinck, James)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
