Johns v. A-1 Asphalt, Inc. et al
| CHERYL JOHNS |
| LARRY SAINDON, A-1 ASPHALT, INC. and DANIEL SEYFFERT |
| 1:2021cv00352 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Janet T Neff |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Cheryl Johns as to Daniel Seyffert waiver sent on 5/10/2021, answer due 7/9/2021 (Kennedy, Katherine) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Cheryl Johns as to Larry Saindon waiver sent on 5/10/2021, answer due 7/9/2021 (Kennedy, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Cheryl Johns as to A-1 Asphalt, Inc. waiver sent on 5/10/2021, answer due 7/9/2021 (Kennedy, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants A-1 Asphalt, Inc., Larry Saindon, Daniel Seyffert (eod) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (eod) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against A-1 Asphalt, Inc., Larry Saindon, Daniel Seyffert filed by Cheryl Johns (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Kennedy, Katherine) Modified text on 4/30/2021 (eod) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff CHERYL JOHNS in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6422107 (Kennedy, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
