Odom #161794 v. Hill et al
| Steven Odom #161794 |
| E. Coe Hill, Lizabeth Ralles, Lisa A. Williams, Rosemary Villasan and Margaret A. Quellette |
| 1:2021cv00403 |
| May 13, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Robert J Jonker |
| Ray Kent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Steven Odom #161794 (jmw) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $10.52 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
| Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Steven Odom #161794 re Complaint with Magistrate Referral #1 (pjw) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents, #2 Additional Financial Documents filed 5/17/2021) (pjw); Modified text on 5/17/2021 (pjw). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Steven Odom #161794 (Attachments: #1 Compliant Index, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (pjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
