Herman #861049 v. Scheibner
Petitioner: Stanley Herman #861049
Respondent: James Scheibner
Case Number: 1:2021cv00634
Filed: July 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Ray Kent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT dismissing habeas action under Rule 4; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying certificate of appealability; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Certified Copy of Order Denying Certificate of Appealability #11 , Judgment Dismissing Habeas Action Under Rule 4 #12 sent via U.S. Mail to Stanley Herman (mlc)
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RESPONSE TO #9 filed by petitioner Stanley Herman #861049 (jem)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER setting miscellaneous deadline: pro se misc deadline set for 9/14/2021; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DENYING IFP: petitioner to pay the entire fee of $ 5.00 within 28 days or the case will be dismissed;(filing fee to be submitted by 9/14/2021); signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Copy of Opinion (Screening) #8 , Order Denying IFP (Able to Pay - Habeas) #7 , Order Setting Misc. Deadline - Prisoner #9 sent via U.S. Mail to Stanley Herman (slk)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STATEMENT RE CONSENT by petitioner Stanley Herman #861049 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (pjw)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 8/17/2021 (pjw)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Stanley Herman #861049 (pjw)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE by petitioner Stanley Herman #861049 re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 , APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit #2 (pjw)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DECLARATION re #1 by petitioner Stanley Herman #861049 (pjw)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Financial Documents) (pjw)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Stanley Herman #861049 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (pjw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Herman #861049 v. Scheibner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stanley Herman #861049
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Scheibner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?