Scott #773869 v. Christiansen et al
Kenneth Scott #773869 |
John Christiansen, Michael Desco and Douglas Krause |
1:2021cv00851 |
October 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STATEMENT RE CONSENT by plaintiff Kenneth Scott #773869 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (eod) |
CHANGE OF ADDRESS for plaintiff Kenneth Scott #773869 to Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility 2500 S Sheridan Dr. Muskegon Heights, MI 49444 as taken from #4 (eod) Modified text on 10/25/2021 (eod) |
(DISREGARD) STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Kenneth Scott #773869 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (eod) Modified text on 10/25/2021; no document attached, replaced by #4 (eod) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 10/22/2021 (eod) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Financial Documents) (eod) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kenneth Scott #773869 (eod) |
Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Kenneth Scott #773869 (eod) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.