Castro v. United States of America
Alex Alberto Castro |
United States of America |
1:2021cv00858 |
October 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Robert J Jonker |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Copy of Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #10 sent via U.S. Mail to Alex Alberto Castro (mlc) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #7 motion for extension of time to file response/reply ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply re #3 and for release of information subject to attorney-client privilege #7 filed by United States of America (Baker, Stephen) |
Filing 8 BRIEF in support of MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply re #3 and for release of information subject to attorney-client privilege #7 and certificate of service filed by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Baker, Stephen) |
Filing 7 MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply re #3 and for release of information subject to attorney-client privilege by respondent United States of America; (Baker, Stephen) |
Copy of Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Order on Motion for Transcript, Order on Motion for Discovery #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Alex Alberto Castro (ns) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #4 motion to appoint counsel; denying #5 motion for transcript; denying #5 motion for discovery ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 5 MOTION for transcript , MOTION for discovery by movant Alex Alberto Castro; (mlc) |
Filing 4 MOTION to appoint counsel by movant Alex Alberto Castro; (mlc) |
Copy of Order to Answer (2255) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Alex Alberto Castro (slk) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING: the U.S. Attorney to answer the motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence within 60 days ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of receipt of case (slk) |
Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Alex Alberto Castro (slk) |
Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) filed by Alex Alberto Castro (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - miscellaneous documents) (slk) Modified text on 10/5/2021 (slk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Castro v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Alex Alberto Castro | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Joel Scott Fauson |
Represented By: | Stephen P. Baker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.